While I’ve been pretty quiet at this site, I’ve been talking to people elsewhere on the web. Something that has hit hard at our house recently is the news of the impending acquisition of Rdio by Pandora, a US-focused streaming radio service. I’m reposting a comment I shared on someone’s Medium post about alternatives to Rdio.
I’ve been using Rdio since 2011. At that time, it was the only decent streaming music service available in Canada and got me through a year of grad school. It was instant love for a big name streaming service not (legally) available in Canada before. At home, we’ve since created 38 very personal playlists in Rdio featuring pop, jazz, electronica, Quebecois, kid-friendly and classical tunes and we’ve been completely schooled in Rdio’s UI.
Since then, other services have become available in Canada: Google Music, Deezer, Apple Music, Spotify, Tidal, and in a very low-key and recent move, Napster (Rhapsody) has “returned”. I’ve tried all the other services since they’ve launched here.
But nothing beats your first love. It would help moving on to another if your first love wasn’t by far the most beautiful. By FAR (ugh, Rhapsody) — on anyplatform! As you noted, I also find the new release presentation and social integration much more functional and pleasant on Rdio than any of the other services.
Apart from transferring all our Rdio playlists, key considerations in our switch are Sonos integration and Android/iOS compatibility. I’m holding out on Apple until they work things out with Sonos. We’re waffling between Spotify (whose personalized Discover Weekly has delivered excellent tracks since they started the service in July), Deezer (which has fantastically discoverable French music from around the world but an awkward UI we are having trouble getting used to [why is Flow so prominent?]) and one vote (*MY HUSBAND) for Google Play Music.
The lesson that struck home again (one would think we would learn from the example of photo storage services that have been acquired/bankrupted/ended) is to hold things lightly in this digital age, as nothing seems to last and so many things shift and drift away.
So sad. I’m not sure we’ll be used to whatever service we choose next, but still, RIP to another web service.
So…. I was derailed from my winter 2015 timeline because of broken ribs, my broken ribs (5 of them, 5!!). Totally out of left field, and about a month of pain and recovery. After that, it was about 3 weeks of getting into the rhythm of a (temporary) new position at my university, and then March came and I got back into writing up data findings.
Now, we’ve set a deadline, quickly approaching, to get this baby done. What this means is barricading myself from my house and my son, for increasing periods of time, to be able to write and organize, write and edit and rewrite, and organize and cut and write some more.
And it’s hard, when the neighbourhood looks like this:
Last year, I didn’t really give up things to try and work on grad studies. I leaped into new experiences and a wonderful Americana road trip and some tinkering with a new camera, and didn’t really FOCUS on getting school work done.
But now I am doing what grad students have done since time immemorial – giving up parts of the fullest, most interesting, selfish life, in order to move forward and make progress in their studies.
So I had this vision of the overall SHAPE of my thesis, formed in part by books on grad school and by mandatory 100-level grad classes on Methodology and various theories, all helpful and well-intentioned.
After a year plus of compiling, branching out, note-taking and reading, this model dissolved into something quite different.
Later, I found that mapping individual chunks helped with understanding the different sections.
It has been this, mapping and moving, over and over, for the past 2 years now. Is it like this for everyone working on a grad thesis? Do others have an easier time of sorting through their articles, of keeping their sections clear and streamlined?
The distinctions betweens theories, methods and related ideas sort of got fuzzy – there were a lot of similar ideas, overlapping ideas, adjacent ideas, and I am still parsing through which are intended as my framework for analysis and which ones apply to my reasons for selected method. This is the work I am doing now, sorting and organizing and narrowing the different bubbles.
What I long for, to borrow from my favourite genius billionaire playboy philanthropist, is to get to a point where I can get the different sections correctly and clearly aligned, and to narrow them all down like:
and have a neat, little product, fit for submission at the end:
I would love to hear how others map and organize their notes and ideas over the course of their grad studies.
Well HELLO 2015 and a new year!
It’s been a while since I’ve added anything to this blog. It’s not that my reading and research have been on hiatus, it’s more that things have become rather messy as the notes and papers have compiled and I was daunted at getting that heap of words and theories and the growing, increasingly tangled mass of ideas into a succinct, mashable format, fit for, god-forbid, reading by the public (when it was hard enough to even submit to my professor!).
Well, maybe it’s time to update and write again.
A friend told me about an experimental course happening at Thompson Rivers University in January, all full of things I’m rather a fan of: a new open (yes), online (yes), narrative- (yes), visual- (yes) story-telling (yes, yes!) course that will be available, well, for anyone.
The course hit all the “try me! try me!” buttons, but I wasn’t (still not) sure how to allocate time to this new course versus working on my remaining grad work.
I had a conversation with one of the course moderators/instructors, and he mentioned that the narrative aspect may fit well into my encapsulating/summarizing/sharing of the PROCESS of my current research, and maybe sharing the findings, if I wanted to make an online portfolio. This sounds do-able, This sounds like something that I could do in adjunct to my work, but that wouldn’t take me TOO much off course.
The (academic? knowledge-seeking? knowledge-building?) path is right in front of me. It just SEEMS like the end goal is far away and a bit unclear. But I want to clarify the process of DOING the work. Maybe the thinking/writing/shaping/sharing exercises in this course will help with this.
I recently returned from a visit to Seattle, Washington, about 6 hours by car from our town. The purpose of the trip was to investigate and document The Darkroom Series 3.0, a photo exhibit/show of northwest-based photographs taken solely on mobile phones. The show was held at Zeitgeist Coffee, near King Street Station in downtown Seattle. Part of my objective was to gauge the sense of the northwest* as expressed by mobile photographers and by residents, and also to gain a personal feeling and experience for myself.
Seattle is a city I’ve visited many many times – and I love it every visit. This time was no exception. In fact, not having been for over a year, I loved it more – the big city, the green spaces interspersed with the urban centre, the Pacific Ocean, the bustling creative markets and shops – these things felt like welcome to me, with its similarities to Vancouver, which I still miss since moving away.
So there was familiarity, but also a sense of freshness. This trip, I focused on what #northwestisbest might mean. This was the focus of the Darkroom show, and is the phenomenon that I’m looking at for my thesis. There is clearly a perspective of rural, landscape-based visual expression of the northwest, that might clash but somehow doesn’t, with a city-centred view of the northwest that I previously held. But there was a clearly contrasting (yet complementary) understanding of what the northwest means and looks like, for residents as well as expressed through public photo streams.
One of the strongest impressions I left with is the very vibrant community and activity around mobile phone photography in Seattle. They have Juxt, a very strong Instagram community, and a city news station and channel that itself is actively involved in and supportive of phone photography. These groups are key to the projects, meet ups and interactions of the public and very motivated, creative individuals centred around phone photography, resulting in palpable energy and creative work coming out of the northwest.
There is more, a lot more, that I experienced during my trip, but I’m still getting my head around it. I wish I could have had another month or two there! I’ll be returning in the next few weeks and look forward to seeing the city and surrounding areas, this time when its a bit warmer.
*Northwest is used here to denote the geographical region of Oregon and Washington, but according to the #northwest, #northwestisbest, #nw and #nwistbest tagged photos and posts on social networks, the term seems to indicate a much broader region extending from Northern California up through British Columbia to southern Alaska.
After 18 months of thinking that my thesis will be grounded in ideas about the tourist gaze (John Urry), it turns out that it is another perspective that ties together the various strands of my ideas about the mobile phone, photography and place. It’s a tiny bit disheartening thinking that months of reading/collecting/reflecting will be “thrown out” – but no, that’s too extreme. Surely the reading and ideas will enrich the depth and lend some alternative views to my current project? (And imagine: my project is only a master’s thesis, whereas I know and read of PhD students who’ve had to discard YEARS and hundreds of pages of theory and lit review from their dissertations – just take a peek over at The Thesis Whisperer for any number of anecdotes and discussions).
I came across some of Urry’s later work looking at mobility (which seems a natural progression from gazing, walking and tourism studies) and then Mimi Sheller’s writing on the subject area, and BAM, my mental world shifted a bit.
Mobility, as I have understood it, encompasses so much more than movement, that is walking and driving. It includes, in its various expressions and articulations in different academic fields, movements of FLOW – of ideas, of technologies, of embodied presence, as well as the movement of bodies in absence through and in place.
It really really resonates and though I was a little sad to step away from the tourist gaze, I am thrilled to explore deeper the ideas of mobility as they relate to the camera phone and to the ways in which we share and consume photos of place.
I took a LEAP – I’m already on the new trajectory – and it’s very exciting!
I was surprised to see how much coverage and conversation took place over the selfie during the last quarter of this year. In just some of the New York publications, for example, that I browse, there were many posts on this subject: the article in the “News Analysis” section of the Times from October, James Franco in the Times just this week discussing why he would rather see an individual’s gallery include selfies than not have any at all, the mildly sensational New York Post post on the selfie-shot that caught a suicide-jumper in-action, and the New York Daily News mention and snapshot of President Obama caught mid-selfie-shot.
It was odd to see the media buzz and interest around something that has been around, well, forever. A fascinating example of a very well-done and interesting selfie gallery that’s been around for a long time and that has itself garnered some buzz over the years is that of Noah Kalina, in which he shares a shot of himself that he’s taken regularly, if not every day, since 2000.
It’s especially interesting how selfies have been taken up by teenagers all over the world – a public performance of self-identity and assertion shared on social networks, in photographic, and more recently, in video format. In all of the photo social networks I belong to or have at some point belonged to (PicPlz before its demise, Eyeem, Instagram, Meebo, LemeLeme, Kakao Story for example), there are countless selfies in the public and private photo streams, noticeably by teens and mid-twenty-somethings who regularly document and post images of themselves, whether the images capture their outfits, their nails, and/or their faces.
I, too, participate in taking pictures of myself, though I don’t share them to a public stream. Rather, I own a very simple app called Everyday, launched in March 2011, whose sole purpose is to allow you to take selfies and then compile them into a time-lapse video, should you wish. Thus, I have a personal gallery of shots of my face that I have taken since October 2011 (when I first purchased an iPhone).
There is the question of WHY so many people indulge and practice taking pictures of themselves, and more recently, posting the pictures to one’s various public and private networks. It’s been discussed plenty on the internet recently (just Google “selfie”) but the point that stands out for me is that advances in technology and software, and the always-on connection to the internet makes possible the fulfilment of people’s secret desire(s) to seen, recognized and known through a visual performance that is vaguely narcissistic and expressive. There’s a whole master’s thesis that can be written on that topic, for sure.
Once in a while, one comes across something very stirring and humane in a self-portrait series. I was recently reminded me of this series of self-shot portraits that I came across on Tumblr and had reposted to my own tumblog earlier in the fall:
Shot by Sophie Starzenski, it’s a unique chronicle of her pregnancy and a very interesting and beautiful version of the selfie.
Came across this post today, on the “Constant Moment” vs. the “Decisive Moment.
Author Clayton Cubitt describes the Decisive Moment as “the creation of art through the curation of time.”
But technological development and commercial hardware has made possible the capture of moments, from all angles, at all times, connected constantly with a stream of viewers/commenters/information channels. Cubitt suggests that while such capture of moments is not new to photography, what has emerged is the Constant Moment, which in photography can be understood as viewing and capture that is “as close to a time machine” as we are likely to get, where what has been captured can be seen forward and backwards, from any which angle, and where in it is captured the “billion missed Decisive Moments that previously slipped through our fingers.”
Reading, making notes, summarizing and then selecting the appropriate ideas and arguments to forward your own arguments or to set the backdrop of the presentation. What grad student doesn’t get trained in this process?
The top 4 books are vital, fascinating finds in my research process. At least 3 of them were key texts in what I explored in my coursework, and parts of them will be quoted in my final thesis.
While reading up on visual communication, I fell into critical tourism, and in turn in love with critical geography, a field I didn’t even know existed. Ah, the wonder of academic inquiry that leads us down twists and turns of questions and explorations unexpected!